top of page

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, involved the main suspect, Lee Harvey Oswald. While many citizens disagree, the Warren Commission’s official answer is that the only shooter was Lee Harvey Oswald. Conspiracy theories such as the influence of organized crime, the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and an additional shooter. While many of the theories were neither confirmed nor denied,  each reflects a public mistrust of government institutions during and after the Cold War. 

A main theory is that the Central Intelligence Agency staged the assassination in response to President Kennedy’s failure to accept the foreign policy with the Soviet Union and Cuba. Oswald’s ambiguous background: a former U.S. Marine who joined the USSR in 1959, lived in  Minsk for over two years, then returned to the United States in 1962 (Mailer 154). Norman  Mailer, in his biographical study of Oswald, draws on declassified files and FBI transcripts to argue that Oswald’s movements attracted the sustained attention of intelligence agencies,  suggesting he was more than an ordinary private citizen (Mailer 74–78). Mailer’s theory highlights Oswald’s ties to the USSR and previous military connections, yet there is no evidence linking these contacts to CIA leadership. The significance of this theory due to the mistrust of the security state during the Cold War, suggesting that the President was not killed by a random citizen but by a government agency acting in its own interests.

Lee Harvey Oswald, a 24-year-old former military service member, is widely recognized for assassinating President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Born in 1939, Oswald experienced a difficult upbringing characterized by instability and psychological distress, which contributed to his withdrawn, attention-seeking, and reckless behavior. This analysis examines how Oswald’s early traumatic experiences influenced his eventual apostate to the United States. During Oswald's childhood, he showed social withdrawal from his peers. This behavior can be traced to his birth in 1939, following his father's departure and frequent relocations by his mother. Psychologists have observed that the lack of emotional care in Oswald's early years hindered his ability to socialize as an adult (Bugliosi, 4-7). His early isolation fostered increasing estrangement from society and contributed to his later radicalized actions. Alongside lack of support, Oswald had the need to be seen which became a driving force behind his actions, coming low self-worth and lack of emotional care during his childhood years. Unable to keep a job, Oswald’s stability started to diminish (Lee Harvey Oswald, 2026). The evidence describes Oswald’s search for validation as linked to his sense of isolation and a fragmented self-identity. Additionally, suggesting that the assassination stood for not a political act, but a desperate attempt to secure a legacy (Abrahamsen, 1967; Posner, 2003).

Lee Harvey Oswald and The Assassination of JFK

John_F._Kennedy,_White_House_color_photo_portrait.jpg
Section 2

Oswald’s actions of recklessness further damage his personal relationships in his life. Specifically, his documented abuse in marriage to Marina Oswald, which, according to Mailer (1995), proves a pattern instability and difficulty forming healthy attachments, is a part of his struggles. In addition, his frequent job losses and recurring interpersonal conflicts, described in detail by biographical accounts ("Lee Harvey Oswald" 2026), show efforts and repeated failures to keep relationships outside his marriage. (Abrahamsen, 1967) Viewing these patterns together, it's clear that these behaviors reflect what Abrahamsen (1967) characterizes as deep-seated feelings of inadequacy, isolation, and a instability characterisitc. Incorporating abuse in his marriage, show the extent to which his external conflicts were a direct result of internal psychological distress. (Abrahamsen, 1967) Lee Harvey Oswald exemplifies how an unstable childhood, evolving beliefs, and an intense need for recognition can coalesce to drive an individual toward extreme actions. While the complete reality of the assassination contest, a deeper analysis of Oswald’s psychological makeup reveals the mechanisms by which chronic isolation and unmet emotional needs contributed to his decision-making. This case highlights not only the personal repercussions of unresolved psychological conflict but also the wider societal implications when such issues go unaddressed. Therefore, Oswald's life underscores the importance of understanding individual psychological factors within broader historical events, suggesting that comprehensive attention to mental health could be critical in preventing similarly catastrophic outcomes.

The Theories

Abrahamsen, David. “A Study of Lee Harvey Oswald: Psychological Capability of Murder.” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, vol. 43, no. 10, Oct. 1967, pp. 861–888. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1806829/.

Bugliosi, Vincent. Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy. W. W. Norton, 2007.

“John F. Kennedy’s Assassination: Photo Showing Lee Harvey Oswald with Gun Used to Kill Former President ‘Authentic.’” The Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-f-kennedy-s-assassination-photo-showing-lee-harvey-oswald-with-gun-used-to-kill-former-president-authentic-a6699751.html.

“Lee Harvey Oswald.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 2026.

Mailer, Norman. Oswald’s Tale: An American Mystery. Random House, 1995.

“Oswald in the USSR.” The New Yorker, 10 Apr. 1995, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1995/04/10/oswald-in-the-ussr.

Posner, Gerald. Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK. Anchor Books, 1993.

“Surgeon’s Sketch Suggests 2 Gunmen Killed JFK.” New York Post, 21 June 2017, https://nypost.com/2017/06/21/surgeons-sketch-suggests-2-gunmen-killed-jfk/.

United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations. Report of the Select Committee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives. United States Government Printing Office, 1979. National Archives, www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/toc. Accessed 4 May 2026.

“White House Delays the Release of Secret JFK Assassination Records, Citing COVID-19.” WUNC, 25 Oct. 2021, https://www.wunc.org/2021-10-25/white-house-delays-the-release-of-secret-jfk-assassination-records-citing-covid-19.

“Who Was Jack Ruby? Man Who Killed Lee Harvey Oswald Explained.” The Sun, https://www.the-sun.com/news/6922392/who-jack-ruby-lee-harvey-oswald-assassination/.

The second most accepted theory involves the possibility of two shooters on the grassy knoll near Dealey Plaza. This idea gained attention from eyewitnesses due to the difficulty of a lone gunman firing multiple precise shots within the available time window. The House Select  Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), in its final report, concluded there was a “high probability”  that two gunmen had fired at President Kennedy, while acknowledging that it was “unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy” (United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations 1). A later review by the National Academy of Sciences disputed the underlying assumption of that conclusion, and no physical evidence has ever been produced from the knoll area (Posner 234– 241). The theory endures in part because of the public’s difficulty in accepting that a lone individual could have altered history. 

A third theory implies that American organized crime was involved in the assassination. There is a link to Jack Ruby, the Dallas nightclub owner who fatally shot Oswald inside Dallas Police  Headquarters just two days after the assassination. The HSCA’s 1979 report found that the  Warren Commission had significantly underestimated Ruby’s ties to the criminal underworld,  noting that he had “numbers of associates in the underworld” in the months leading up to the assassination (United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations 149–150). This theory is supported by the clear motive of mob leaders like Carlos Marcello; however, Vincent Bugliosi argues that the Mafia would never risk having them on the FBI watchlist, which would follow the assassination of a U.S. President (Bugliosi 1142). This theory is important because it connects the assassination to the immediate execution of the suspect.  

The assassination of John F. Kennedy is most known for the official lone-gunman conclusion and theories involving the CIA, a second shooter, and organized crime. While each 

Conspiracy offers a different perspective on the motives of the crime; they all reflect a national struggle to accept that a single, disillusioned individual changed history

John fitzgerald Kennedy
May 29, 1917 - November 22, 1963

35th president of the United States
 

download.jpg
backyardphot.jpg
images (1).jpg
Work Cited 
Gopnik-JFK-Lede.webp
download (2).jpg
download (3).jpg
download (4).jpg
170621-kennedy-assassination-shooters-03.webp

"The energy, the faith, the devotion

     which we bring to this endeavor

    will light our country 

  and all who serve it,

      and the glow from that fire

       can truly light the world". -JFK's     gravesite plaques.

jfk_grave.jpg

Fig. 2. Lee pictured with two Dallas officers.   

The Portal to Texas

Fig. 4. Lee pictured with his wife, Marina, and his daughter, June. 

The New Yorker

Photo from November 22nd, 1963. 

WUNC News

Photo of Jack Ruby. 

The U.S. Sun

Signed sketch titled ''President Kennedy's Wounds," by Dr. Robert McClelland, one of the physicians who attended to John F. Kennedy after the shooting.

NYPOST

Key Witnesses in the JFK Assassination: What We Know

  • Apr 29
  • 4 min read

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, remains one of the most scrutinized events in American history. With countless theories and speculations surrounding the incident, the testimonies of key witnesses have played a crucial role in piecing together the events of that fateful day. This blog post delves into the accounts of those who were present during the assassination, examining their statements, the inconsistencies, and how their testimonies have shaped our understanding of this pivotal moment in history.


Eye-level view of Dealey Plaza, the site of JFK's assassination
Eye-level view of Dealey Plaza, the site of JFK's assassination

The Scene of the Crime


Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, was the site of the assassination. On that day, a motorcade carrying President Kennedy passed through the plaza, where thousands of onlookers had gathered to witness the event. The atmosphere was electric, filled with excitement and anticipation. However, this excitement quickly turned to horror as shots rang out, forever changing the course of American history.


Key Witnesses


Several individuals witnessed the assassination, each providing unique perspectives on the events that unfolded. Here are some of the most notable witnesses:


1. Abraham Zapruder


Abraham Zapruder, a dress manufacturer, is perhaps the most famous witness due to his home movie capturing the assassination. His footage, known as the Zapruder film, provided crucial visual evidence of the shooting. The film has been analyzed extensively and remains a key piece of evidence in understanding the sequence of events.


  • Key Points from Zapruder's Testimony:

- He was positioned on a concrete pedestal, giving him a clear view of the motorcade.

- Zapruder reported hearing three shots, which he initially thought were firecrackers.

- His film showed the moment Kennedy was struck, providing a chilling visual of the event.


2. Mary Moorman


Mary Moorman was another eyewitness who captured a photograph during the assassination. Her image, taken just moments after the shots were fired, has been used to analyze the scene and the reactions of those present.


  • Key Points from Moorman's Testimony:

- She was standing near Zapruder and took a picture with her Polaroid camera.

- Moorman described seeing the President's head move violently backward after the shot.

- Her photograph has been scrutinized for details regarding the trajectory of the bullets.


3. Jean Hill


Jean Hill, known as the "Lady in Red," was also present in Dealey Plaza. She provided a detailed account of the events and was vocal about her belief that shots came from the grassy knoll, rather than the Texas School Book Depository.


  • Key Points from Hill's Testimony:

- Hill reported seeing a man with a rifle on the grassy knoll.

- She described the chaos that ensued after the shots were fired, including the reactions of the crowd.

- Hill's testimony has fueled various conspiracy theories regarding the assassination.


The Aftermath


The immediate aftermath of the assassination saw a flurry of activity as law enforcement and medical personnel responded to the scene. Witnesses were interviewed, and their accounts began to shape the narrative of what happened that day.


4. Officer J.D. Tippit


Officer J.D. Tippit was a Dallas police officer who was shot and killed shortly after the assassination. His death is often linked to Lee Harvey Oswald, who was arrested later that day.


  • Key Points from Tippit's Testimony:

- Tippit had stopped Oswald for questioning shortly after the assassination.

- Witnesses reported seeing Tippit approach Oswald, leading to a confrontation.

- The circumstances surrounding Tippit's death remain a point of contention in the investigation.


5. Lee Harvey Oswald


Lee Harvey Oswald, the man accused of assassinating Kennedy, was also a key figure in the narrative. His arrest and subsequent murder by Jack Ruby added layers of complexity to the investigation.


  • Key Points from Oswald's Testimony:

- Oswald denied any involvement in the assassination, claiming he was a "patsy."

- His behavior during police interrogations raised questions about his mental state.

- Oswald's death prevented further questioning and investigation into his motives.


Analyzing the Testimonies


The testimonies of these witnesses have been analyzed for inconsistencies and corroborations. Some witnesses reported hearing different numbers of shots, while others disagreed on the location of the shooter. These discrepancies have fueled conspiracy theories and debates about the true nature of the assassination.


The Role of the Warren Commission


The Warren Commission was established to investigate the assassination and produced a report that concluded Oswald acted alone. However, many witnesses felt their testimonies were misrepresented or overlooked.


  • Key Findings of the Warren Commission:

- The Commission concluded that three shots were fired, two of which struck Kennedy.

- It found no credible evidence of a conspiracy.

- Many witnesses felt their accounts were not adequately considered.


The Impact of Witness Testimonies on Conspiracy Theories


The varying accounts of witnesses have led to numerous conspiracy theories regarding the assassination. Some believe that multiple shooters were involved, while others argue that there was a larger plot to kill Kennedy.


  • Common Conspiracy Theories:

- The involvement of the CIA or organized crime.

- The idea that Oswald was framed or set up.

- The belief that there were additional shooters on the grassy knoll.


The Legacy of the Witnesses


The witnesses of the JFK assassination have left a lasting impact on American history. Their accounts continue to be studied, debated, and analyzed, shaping our understanding of that tragic day.


The Importance of Eyewitness Accounts


Eyewitness accounts are crucial in any investigation, but they can also be unreliable. Factors such as stress, trauma, and the passage of time can affect memory and perception.


  • Challenges with Eyewitness Testimonies:

- Memory can be influenced by external factors, leading to inconsistencies.

- The stress of witnessing a traumatic event can alter perceptions.

- Different perspectives can lead to conflicting accounts.


Conclusion


The assassination of John F. Kennedy remains a complex and controversial topic. The testimonies of key witnesses provide valuable insights into the events of that day, but they also raise questions about the reliability of memory and the nature of truth. As we continue to explore this pivotal moment in history, the voices of those who witnessed the assassination will remain integral to our understanding.


The legacy of the witnesses serves as a reminder of the importance of seeking truth and understanding in the face of tragedy. As new evidence and perspectives emerge, the story of JFK's assassination continues to evolve, inviting us to question, reflect, and learn from the past.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page