top of page

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, involved the main suspect, Lee Harvey Oswald. While many citizens disagree, the Warren Commission’s official answer is that the only shooter was Lee Harvey Oswald. Conspiracy theories such as the influence of organized crime, the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and an additional shooter. While many of the theories were neither confirmed nor denied,  each reflects a public mistrust of government institutions during and after the Cold War. 

A main theory is that the Central Intelligence Agency staged the assassination in response to President Kennedy’s failure to accept the foreign policy with the Soviet Union and Cuba. Oswald’s ambiguous background: a former U.S. Marine who joined the USSR in 1959, lived in  Minsk for over two years, then returned to the United States in 1962 (Mailer 154). Norman  Mailer, in his biographical study of Oswald, draws on declassified files and FBI transcripts to argue that Oswald’s movements attracted the sustained attention of intelligence agencies,  suggesting he was more than an ordinary private citizen (Mailer 74–78). Mailer’s theory highlights Oswald’s ties to the USSR and previous military connections, yet there is no evidence linking these contacts to CIA leadership. The significance of this theory due to the mistrust of the security state during the Cold War, suggesting that the President was not killed by a random citizen but by a government agency acting in its own interests.

Lee Harvey Oswald, a 24-year-old former military service member, is widely recognized for assassinating President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Born in 1939, Oswald experienced a difficult upbringing characterized by instability and psychological distress, which contributed to his withdrawn, attention-seeking, and reckless behavior. This analysis examines how Oswald’s early traumatic experiences influenced his eventual apostate to the United States. During Oswald's childhood, he showed social withdrawal from his peers. This behavior can be traced to his birth in 1939, following his father's departure and frequent relocations by his mother. Psychologists have observed that the lack of emotional care in Oswald's early years hindered his ability to socialize as an adult (Bugliosi, 4-7). His early isolation fostered increasing estrangement from society and contributed to his later radicalized actions. Alongside lack of support, Oswald had the need to be seen which became a driving force behind his actions, coming low self-worth and lack of emotional care during his childhood years. Unable to keep a job, Oswald’s stability started to diminish (Lee Harvey Oswald, 2026). The evidence describes Oswald’s search for validation as linked to his sense of isolation and a fragmented self-identity. Additionally, suggesting that the assassination stood for not a political act, but a desperate attempt to secure a legacy (Abrahamsen, 1967; Posner, 2003).

Lee Harvey Oswald and The Assassination of JFK

John_F._Kennedy,_White_House_color_photo_portrait.jpg
Section 2

Oswald’s actions of recklessness further damage his personal relationships in his life. Specifically, his documented abuse in marriage to Marina Oswald, which, according to Mailer (1995), proves a pattern instability and difficulty forming healthy attachments, is a part of his struggles. In addition, his frequent job losses and recurring interpersonal conflicts, described in detail by biographical accounts ("Lee Harvey Oswald" 2026), show efforts and repeated failures to keep relationships outside his marriage. (Abrahamsen, 1967) Viewing these patterns together, it's clear that these behaviors reflect what Abrahamsen (1967) characterizes as deep-seated feelings of inadequacy, isolation, and a instability characterisitc. Incorporating abuse in his marriage, show the extent to which his external conflicts were a direct result of internal psychological distress. (Abrahamsen, 1967) Lee Harvey Oswald exemplifies how an unstable childhood, evolving beliefs, and an intense need for recognition can coalesce to drive an individual toward extreme actions. While the complete reality of the assassination contest, a deeper analysis of Oswald’s psychological makeup reveals the mechanisms by which chronic isolation and unmet emotional needs contributed to his decision-making. This case highlights not only the personal repercussions of unresolved psychological conflict but also the wider societal implications when such issues go unaddressed. Therefore, Oswald's life underscores the importance of understanding individual psychological factors within broader historical events, suggesting that comprehensive attention to mental health could be critical in preventing similarly catastrophic outcomes.

The Theories

Abrahamsen, David. “A Study of Lee Harvey Oswald: Psychological Capability of Murder.” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, vol. 43, no. 10, Oct. 1967, pp. 861–888. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1806829/.

​

Bugliosi, Vincent. Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy. W. W. Norton, 2007.

​

“John F. Kennedy’s Assassination: Photo Showing Lee Harvey Oswald with Gun Used to Kill Former President ‘Authentic.’” The Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-f-kennedy-s-assassination-photo-showing-lee-harvey-oswald-with-gun-used-to-kill-former-president-authentic-a6699751.html.

​

“Lee Harvey Oswald.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 2026.

​

Mailer, Norman. Oswald’s Tale: An American Mystery. Random House, 1995.

​

“Oswald in the USSR.” The New Yorker, 10 Apr. 1995, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1995/04/10/oswald-in-the-ussr.

​

Posner, Gerald. Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK. Anchor Books, 1993.

​

“Surgeon’s Sketch Suggests 2 Gunmen Killed JFK.” New York Post, 21 June 2017, https://nypost.com/2017/06/21/surgeons-sketch-suggests-2-gunmen-killed-jfk/.

​

United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations. Report of the Select Committee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives. United States Government Printing Office, 1979. National Archives, www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/toc. Accessed 4 May 2026.

​

“White House Delays the Release of Secret JFK Assassination Records, Citing COVID-19.” WUNC, 25 Oct. 2021, https://www.wunc.org/2021-10-25/white-house-delays-the-release-of-secret-jfk-assassination-records-citing-covid-19.

​

“Who Was Jack Ruby? Man Who Killed Lee Harvey Oswald Explained.” The Sun, https://www.the-sun.com/news/6922392/who-jack-ruby-lee-harvey-oswald-assassination/.

The second most accepted theory involves the possibility of two shooters on the grassy knoll near Dealey Plaza. This idea gained attention from eyewitnesses due to the difficulty of a lone gunman firing multiple precise shots within the available time window. The House Select  Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), in its final report, concluded there was a “high probability”  that two gunmen had fired at President Kennedy, while acknowledging that it was “unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy” (United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations 1). A later review by the National Academy of Sciences disputed the underlying assumption of that conclusion, and no physical evidence has ever been produced from the knoll area (Posner 234– 241). The theory endures in part because of the public’s difficulty in accepting that a lone individual could have altered history. 

A third theory implies that American organized crime was involved in the assassination. There is a link to Jack Ruby, the Dallas nightclub owner who fatally shot Oswald inside Dallas Police  Headquarters just two days after the assassination. The HSCA’s 1979 report found that the  Warren Commission had significantly underestimated Ruby’s ties to the criminal underworld,  noting that he had “numbers of associates in the underworld” in the months leading up to the assassination (United States, House Select Committee on Assassinations 149–150). This theory is supported by the clear motive of mob leaders like Carlos Marcello; however, Vincent Bugliosi argues that the Mafia would never risk having them on the FBI watchlist, which would follow the assassination of a U.S. President (Bugliosi 1142). This theory is important because it connects the assassination to the immediate execution of the suspect.  

The assassination of John F. Kennedy is most known for the official lone-gunman conclusion and theories involving the CIA, a second shooter, and organized crime. While each 

Conspiracy offers a different perspective on the motives of the crime; they all reflect a national struggle to accept that a single, disillusioned individual changed history

John fitzgerald Kennedy
May 29, 1917 - November 22, 1963

35th president of the United States
 

download.jpg
backyardphot.jpg
images (1).jpg
Work Cited 
Gopnik-JFK-Lede.webp
download (2).jpg
download (3).jpg
download (4).jpg
170621-kennedy-assassination-shooters-03.webp

"The energy, the faith, the devotion

     which we bring to this endeavor

    will light our country 

  and all who serve it,

      and the glow from that fire

       can truly light the world". -JFK's     gravesite plaques.

​

jfk_grave.jpg

Fig. 2. Lee pictured with two Dallas officers.   

The Portal to Texas

Fig. 4. Lee pictured with his wife, Marina, and his daughter, June. 

The New Yorker

Photo from November 22nd, 1963. 

WUNC News

Photo of Jack Ruby. 

The U.S. Sun

Signed sketch titled ''President Kennedy's Wounds," by Dr. Robert McClelland, one of the physicians who attended to John F. Kennedy after the shooting.

NYPOST

Uncovering Hidden Facts About the JFK Assassination

  • Apr 29
  • 4 min read

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, remains one of the most controversial and debated events in American history. While the official narrative states that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, numerous theories and hidden facts continue to emerge, challenging this conclusion. In this blog post, we will explore some of these lesser-known aspects of the JFK assassination, shedding light on the complexities surrounding that fateful day.


High angle view of Dealey Plaza, the site of JFK's assassination
High angle view of Dealey Plaza, the site of JFK's assassination

The Context of the 1960s


To understand the significance of JFK's assassination, we must first look at the context of the 1960s. This was a time of great social upheaval in the United States, marked by the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, and a growing distrust in government. Kennedy's presidency was characterized by a push for civil rights, a focus on space exploration, and a commitment to combating communism. His assassination not only shocked the nation but also intensified the existing tensions and conspiracy theories.


The Political Climate


The political climate during JFK's presidency was fraught with tension. The Cold War was at its peak, and the threat of nuclear war loomed large. Kennedy's administration faced significant challenges, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and the escalating conflict in Vietnam. These events contributed to a sense of urgency and paranoia, which would later fuel conspiracy theories surrounding his assassination.


The Role of the Media


The media played a crucial role in shaping public perception of the assassination. The coverage was intense and immediate, with television bringing the events into living rooms across the nation. This unprecedented access to information created a sense of urgency and speculation, leading to a plethora of theories about who was responsible for JFK's death.


The Official Narrative


The Warren Commission, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson, concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the assassination of JFK. However, this conclusion has been met with skepticism over the years. Many believe that the investigation was flawed and that key evidence was overlooked.


Flaws in the Warren Commission Report


Critics of the Warren Commission have pointed out several flaws in its findings:


  • Limited Scope: The Commission focused primarily on Oswald, neglecting other potential suspects and motives.

  • Inconsistent Testimonies: Many witnesses provided conflicting accounts of the events leading up to and following the assassination.

  • Suppressed Evidence: Some documents and evidence were withheld from the public, leading to speculation about what was being hidden.


Conspiracy Theories


The JFK assassination has spawned countless conspiracy theories, each with its own set of claims and evidence. Here are a few of the most prominent theories:


The Mafia Connection


One of the most popular theories suggests that the Mafia was involved in JFK's assassination. This theory posits that organized crime figures were unhappy with Kennedy's crackdown on their operations and sought revenge. Some evidence supporting this theory includes:


  • Jack Ruby: The nightclub owner who killed Oswald, Ruby had connections to organized crime.

  • Testimonies: Several witnesses claimed to have seen Mafia members in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination.


The CIA's Involvement


Another theory suggests that the CIA played a role in JFK's assassination. Proponents of this theory argue that Kennedy's policies, particularly regarding Cuba and Vietnam, threatened the agency's interests. Key points include:


  • Bay of Pigs: Kennedy's failure at the Bay of Pigs invasion angered many within the CIA.

  • Secret Operations: The CIA had a history of covert operations, leading some to believe they could have orchestrated the assassination.


The "Lone Gunman" Theory


While the official narrative supports the lone gunman theory, many believe it oversimplifies the situation. Critics argue that the evidence does not support the idea that Oswald acted alone. Key arguments include:


  • Multiple Gunmen: Some witnesses reported hearing shots from different locations, suggesting more than one shooter.

  • Ballistics Evidence: Questions have been raised about the trajectory of the bullets and the number of shots fired.


The Aftermath


The assassination of JFK had profound effects on American society and politics. The immediate aftermath saw a nation in mourning, but it also led to significant changes in government and public perception.


The Impact on Civil Rights


Kennedy's assassination galvanized the civil rights movement. His death created a sense of urgency among activists, leading to significant legislative changes, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.


The Rise of Conspiracy Theories


In the wake of JFK's assassination, conspiracy theories flourished. The lack of trust in the government and the media fueled speculation, leading to a culture where many Americans began to question official narratives. This skepticism persists today, influencing how people view significant events.


New Evidence and Ongoing Investigations


In recent years, new evidence and investigations have emerged, reigniting interest in the JFK assassination. Some of these developments include:


Declassified Documents


The release of previously classified documents has shed new light on the events surrounding JFK's assassination. These documents have revealed:


  • Connections to Foreign Governments: Some documents suggest potential involvement from foreign entities, including Cuba and the Soviet Union.

  • Internal Conflicts: Evidence of internal conflicts within the government regarding how to handle the investigation has come to light.


Ongoing Research


Researchers and historians continue to investigate the assassination, seeking to uncover new facts and perspectives. This ongoing research is crucial for understanding the complexities of the event and its implications for American history.


Conclusion


The assassination of JFK remains a deeply complex and controversial topic. While the official narrative points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman, numerous theories and hidden facts challenge this conclusion. As new evidence emerges and public interest continues, the quest for truth surrounding JFK's assassination remains as relevant today as it was in 1963.


As we reflect on this pivotal moment in history, it is essential to remain curious and critical, seeking to understand the layers of complexity that surround such a significant event. The pursuit of truth is not just about uncovering hidden facts; it is about understanding the impact of those facts on our society and our future.

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page